ok, so I have received several comments that I will generously describe as constructive criticism. as I don't have the budget currently to employ a full time om-snacks-man, I am going to take these charges head on.
you are right. I *may* have veered, ever so slightly, from the territory of the "hearty snack" into the "meal." my exuberance to bring you the most aggressive of coverage of all consumables that cross my path has caused me to lose focus.
dear readers, I never want you to be dissatisfied. I appreciate you keeping me true to my mission. the SNACK.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Don't belittle yourself by responding to your critics. In fact, I enjoy being a part of the crumbnibbling masses, shouting at you like paparazzi, knowing that you'll never. ever. respond.
Onward snack empress!
since when are the terms "snacks" and "meals" mutually-exclusive? i think these critics need to get off their high horse and join the snackmaniac express, which has the courage to delve into the realm of meals as well as snacks!
This is not mealmaniac, it is snackmaniac. This is like making too many Rocky movies, you have to know when to limit yourself. Stay with the best product - snacks.
I am not on a high horse, in fact, I am loving the express, and just do not want the product tainted with any dabbling stories that are essentially distractions from the snackmaniac genious.
feel free to diversify with meals, snackmaniac! don't cave to critics. personally, no snack is too big to no longer be considered a snack. you know what's a good snack for me? a juicy t bone with short ribs on the side
Post a Comment